To what extent was colonial development driven by domestic (coloniser) concerns rather than the interests of the colonised Use

However, these activities were instilled to ensure the colonials developed their interests, and did not prioritise the interests of the colonised states. The colonised states had little or no control over these activities, which clearly indicates that colonisation was directed towards expanding the interests of the colonising countries. There are many aspects where the interests of the colonising countries were prioritised than the interests of the colonised countries. These are reflected from the economic focus, political environment and social interaction. Though the colonised countries had their fair share of advantages, most of these activities were directed towards strengthening the economic, political and social standing of the colonising countries (Havinden and Meredith, 1993:23). For instance, the French had a massive advantage in taking over their colonies. They exchanged cheap commodities with resources that were regarded as expensive. For instance, they brought knives and other commodities, while taking resources such as fur, cotton and other cash crops that were vital in production of other commodities. Though Africans gained, the European territories and other colonisers had greater stakes (Fieldhouse, 1986:42). As such, the European countries and other colonisers developed their economies at a faster rate, while the colonised countries did not record the same developments. In addition to this, the colonising countries destabilized the traditional values and customs of the colonised countries. They did not have intensions of understanding the customs and values of the colonised countries, and imposed their own. In the late years of the 1800, European powers felt the urge to invade, occupy and colonise some territories in Africa. This was a period that expressed the need for Europe to control the African territories as they were unexploited places in the world. The African continent was rich in resources, but there were not optimised and fully used. In their own vision, the European countries wanted to instil formal imperialism in the African continent, as it was a basic thing that lacked. They developed the best way to implicate the formal imperialism by fully eradicating the informal imperialism. This clearly shows that Africans were still stuck to their native ways, which was not impressive, especially to the colonisers. The people that were colonised had their own way of life, which was considered a backward trend. To eradicate such, they decided to colonise to instil formal way of life (Mahoney, 2010: 230). This meant that the Africans and other territories that would be colonised would follow the trends of the colonial powers. They would instil various ways that would increase production, performance and economic reliance of these territories. In actual sense, the colonials came with their strategies, economic plans and prospective that would be given to these territories. In using these trends that were introduced, the African territories and other territories that were colonised would improve (Fieldhouse, 1986:27). However, all this was not done as a mutual agreement. Though some territories collaborated with the invasion of these Europeans, they did not consent to the invasion of the colonial driven development strategies. Since the European countries had the financial muscle and a streak of resources, they were better placed to