Thucydides and Waltz Comparison

This thinking was developed in the wake of the Peloponnesian War, a war that shook the inner parts of the different Greek city structures and foundations. His view was that a change in the hierarchy of system with regards to the weaker areas did not have such an effect on the prevalent system within that place but had a certain amount of intolerance as well as commotion as far as the hierarchy of order was concerned, one that related with the stronger states. This meant that the disturbance played quite a fair deal in changing the overall stability of the system as a result. According to him, the war became quite a certainty because the growth of Athenian power was having its toll on the people and more so related to the fear aspects of the Spartan inhabitants.As far as international relations are concerned, Thucydides holds the view that his realism is somewhat having quite a strong impact on the overall perception thus created by the analysts, one that discusses the international relations as a result. Thus these analysts made up for the modern-day thinking ideologies and similar mindsets. As political scientists study the work of Thucydides, they conclude that there has been an endeavor to communicate the silent universals which did their bit at serving the exact basis for the foreign policy which was present within America at the time and not to forget the teaching doctrines which were in the direct perspective of the post World War II period. Thucydides can be credited as the first person who made use of words like anarchic and immoral when one spoke of the regime of international relations and the related concepts that came along with it. Thucydides’ view was given complete significance in the wake of the ‘Melian Dialogue’ which spoke of his testament towards the absence of regulation and equality or justice.